2018年1月29日 星期一

Buddhist Approaches to Dying and Hospice Care in Taiwan


Buddhist Approaches to Dying and Hospice Care in Taiwan
Jonathan Watts

A Public Symposium sponsored by The Dharma Drum Institute of Liberal Arts
in conjunction with
The International Network of Engaged Buddhists (INEB) 18
th General Conference

November 22, 2017
Dharma Drum Mountain Temple

One of the outstanding examples of Taiwanese Engaged Buddhism is the development of Buddhist based hospice care and the training of ordained sangha members in psycho-spiritual care for patients, family, and other caregivers. Such training mirrors older movements found in Western Europe and the United States, such as Clinical Pastoral Education (CPE), which come out of largely Christian cultural contexts. In Asia, however, there has been a need for approaches to dying and hospice care more suitable to Buddhist cultural contexts.

In the mid 1990s, Prof. Dr. Rong-chi Chen, the former Vice Superintendent of National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH), appointed Ven. Huimin, the President of the Dharma Drum Institute of Liberal Arts, and Dr. Ching-yu Chen, the Head of the Department of Family Medicine at NTU Hospital, to develop a specifically Buddhist oriented training program for monks and nuns to work in NTUH’s Hospice. With the support of the Buddhist Lotus Hospice Care Foundation (BLHCF), the program has blossomed over the last two decades, training and certifying monks and nuns to serve in hospices throughout the country. Some of these graduates have now begun to develop community hospice care programs to meet the needs of an aging society that increasingly has to care for the elderly and sick outside of overburdened national medical facilities. This program is a shining example of engaged Buddhism in Taiwan, showing what monastic sangha members can do to confront suffering beyond the borders of their temples, and is now beginning to influence similar movements in other Asian countries like Japan.

It was INEB’s great honor to be hosted by Ven. Humin at Dharma Drum Mountain Temple on November 22, 2017 to provide a series of talks on this work by its founders and most important leaders. We were also honored to have join us for opening comments, Roshi Taitsu Kono—former Chief Priest of the Myoshinji branch of the Rinzai Zen denomination in Japan, former President of the All Japan Buddhist Federation, and current President of Hanazono Buddhist University in Kyoto. The eighty-seven year old Rev. Kono was joined by Rev. Hitoshi Jin, who along with INEB Executive Board member, Jonathan Watts, has created a cooperative alliance the Buddhist Lotus Hospice Care Foundation (BLHCF) to help support a new training program for Buddhist chaplains in Japan run by the Rinbutsuken Institute for Engaged Buddhism based in Tokyo. Rev. Kono’s Hanazono University will be sponsoring a new course for Buddhist chaplains in the coming year, and his presence and comments were greatly appreciated by the hosts.

The symposium began in full with an introduction to the movement in Taiwan by its founder, the eminent Prof. Dr. Rong-chi Chen, Founder of Buddhist Lotus Hospice Care Foundation (BLHCF). Prof. Chen explained that the National Taiwan University Hospice (NTUH) and Palliative Care Unit was the first public unit established in Taiwan in 1995, after private hospices had been established at the Christian Mackay Memorial Hospital in Tamsui in 1990 and the Catholic Cardinal Tien’s Hospital in Hsindian in 1994. At this time, Prof. Chen was the Vice Superintendent of NTU hospital and had become aware of the need for Buddhist monastics to be involved in patient care. He explained, “Although spirituality doesn’t necessarily pertain to religion, if religious representatives can become fully involved, the spiritual care that they could provide would be much more effective.”[1] Prof. Chen also noted that Christian denominations have had specific training for chaplains to serve in hospitals and other places yet Buddhist groups have not. As 70-80% of Taiwanese are Buddhist, he and his colleagues thought it would be good to identify some enthusiastic monks and nuns to begin such training. The major obstacle they discovered, however, was that Buddhist monastics were not used to working in such intensive medical environments. Eventually, everyone in this first training group of candidates dropped out. From this experience, Prof. Chen and his colleagues realized they needed a systematic form of chaplain training. In the previous year, 1994, a group of people from Buddhist universities, both ordained and lay, created the Buddhist Lotus Hospice Care Foundation (BLHCF) to promote hospice and palliative care and Life & Death Education. Prof. Chen was serving as the President of the BLHCF and together they began a systematic plan for a full-fledged clinical Buddhist monastic, hospice training program. Beginning with just two graduates in the initial year of 1999, the numbers of trained monastics quickly grew to seventeen by 2002 and 29 by 2009. By 2017, the number had grown 63 graduates, including 2 Catholic nuns, with 32 now working as clinical monastics in 43 hospices and palliative care wards across the country, such as at Chungshan Medical University Hospital, Chinese Medical University Hospital, and Veterans General Hospital Taichung.

The next speaker was Ven. Huimin, who in 1995 was brought in by Prof. Chen to help develop a specifically indigenous Buddhist model for end-of-life care. Ven. Huimin began by noting that since 2010 Taiwan has been ranked first in Asia in Quality of Death (QOD) Index by the Economist and in 2015 was rated as #6 in the world due to “one of the most transparent and efficient palliative care delivery systems”. In helping to develop the Clinical Buddhist Chaplaincy (CBC) Training Program, Ven. Huimin wanted to address the differences in the occidental and East Asian view of the person and the self. Ven. Humin explained that when the idea of “whole person care” was introduced to Taiwan, medical care was developed that addressed “physicality, mind, and spirit.” This type of Occidental thought, which typically sees the human as consisting of body, mind, and spirit, puts a greater focus on “spiritual care.” In contrast, Buddhism sees the person as consisting of body, feeling, mind, and dharma (i.e. the Four Foundations of Mindfulness as taught in the Satipatana Sutta). This approach focuses more on “awareness care” than “spiritual care.” The two core Buddhist teachings of Not-self and Dependent Origination offer a different view of life from the ones that posit the separate existence of a “true self” or a “spirit” that eternally never changes, or the idea that the body and mind both totally extinguish at death. From the viewpoint of Buddhism, the essence of life comes down to a middle way of seeing the reality of life as neither total extinction nor everlasting eternity. In terms of hospice care, euthanasia and assisted death can be performed in accord with the concern for the person whose feeling and mind are experiencing unsuitable symptoms and levels of pain. Through deeply recognizing the four aspects of a patient (their own body, feeling, mind, and dharma), they can develop a keen awareness and equanimity. By practicing this kind of “awareness care,” Ven. Humin noted that we can help the dying person to purify their mind and at the same time enter the dharma of the fundamental practice of Buddhism.[2]


A lively discussion at the break with Prof. Chen, Ven. Miao Hai (Mainland China), and Ven. Tianwen (Hong Kong)

The third speaker was Ven. Huimin’s co-hort in developing the Clinical Buddhist Chaplaincy (CBC) Training Program, Prof. Ching-Yu Chen from the Department of Family Medicine at NTU Hospital. In addressing at spiritual issues of Buddhist hospice care in Taiwan, Dr. Chen used the First and Second Noble Truths, especially Dependent Origination, to make a clinical assessment of the spiritual issues and pain around dying. These include: loss of self-esteem, self-abandonment, reluctance to part/give up, unfilled hopes/wishes, and fear of death. To deal with these issues that go beyond the expertise of medical doctors, the NTU hospice relies deeply on “team care” amongst the doctors, nurses, social workers, psychiatrists, and clinical chaplains. The team tries to fulfill the patient’s final wishes and to affirm the meaning and value of their life (strength from inside), and to affirm the care of the medical team (strength from outside). The end of suffering happens in the development of a sense of spirituality, which in passive terms means achieving relief of physical pain and tranquility of mind, and in active terms means a change in one’s behavioral patterns through cultivating buddha nature, nurturing compassion, and letting go of possessions. The result is a “good death,” which includes awareness of death, accepting it peacefully, preparing properly including arranging one’s will, and timing the death appropriately. Every Tuesday morning for two hours, the entire care team goes on rounds together to all seventeen beds. The team does an assessment of good death after each patient’s death, usually every week, to audit the quality outcome of the patients’ dying process. At that time, clinical Buddhist chaplains often give important information about spiritual well-being. They also help the palliative team learn how to approach a good death by spiritual care. Dr. Chen noted that the patient becomes a teacher for the team in how to practice dying and that the Palliative Care Unit “is a vihara or practice hall (道場) that encourages the patients, the relatives, and the team members to grow together.”

The next speaker Ven. Frances Lok, the present Director of the Clinical Buddhist Chaplaincy (CBC) Training Program at the NTU Hospital, spoke on the actual work of training Buddhist monastics in hospice care. The program has the goal that every fully trained monastic clinician must have the following qualities:

  • Possess a full understanding of hospice and palliative care
  • Respect medical teamwork and the need to develop various clinical skills
  • Be capable of rendering care as a listener, supporter, and provider of new ideas
  • Be enthusiastic and eager to serve people as a life-death explorer

However, learning such skills can initially be difficult for monks and nuns, who may have been trained idealistically by their own temple to offer the dying very standard phrases like, “Just think positive.”; “You have to let go.”; “Just try to clear your mind for Birth in the Pure Land of the West.” Thus, in the training program they learn how to listen and to empathize with the patient’s predicament and then guide them through a more realistic process of their eventual death. The program is a rigorous one that lasts over five years with more than sixty hours of hospice and palliative care study and consists of four stages:

  1. General Education on the meaning of hospice and palliative care
  2. Shared Courses with clinical professionals that communicates the definition and meaning of spiritual care
  3. Professional Courses for only monastics that covers key issues for working in hospice and palliative care environments
  4. Clinical Internship in which the monastic must be involved in one complete case.

After passing through these levels, they may proceed to clinical training in which the monastic participates in fuller practice as a member of the care team. Despite these challenges and new skills that must be learned, the role of religious professionals in a hospital can become an ordinary thing. Patients at the NTU Hospice will usually ask more from a religious professional than from a nurse or social worker, and 71% of patients will ask for spiritual care from monk or nun. With the support of a pool of lay volunteers, spiritual care can come in a wide variety of ways, such as cooking food that may include Chinese medicinal herbs, reading the patients books, helping to organize special events at the hospice like concerts and birthday parties, and assisting with special requests like facilitating a visit by a particular person or taking the patient on a final visit somewhere.

The last speaker was Ven. Tsung-Tueng, Director of the Great Compassion Institute with her assistant Ven. Zhihui, Lecturer at the Great Compassion Institute, who spoke on Community Hospice Care & Buddhist Monastics. Bhikkhuni Tsung-Teung was the first monastic to be trained in the CBC program, under the guidance of Dr. Ching-yu Chen, and held the position that Ven. Lok now has in training monastics at NTU Hospice. In 2014, she created the Great Compassion Institute to expand and compliment the work being done at NTU Hospital and other hospitals into local communities. The nations of East Asia, like Taiwan and Japan, are facing difficulties in their public health system as a huge proportion of their population is becoming elderly and dying at the same time. Community care systems are increasingly needed as overburdened hospitals cannot handle the overload of patients. Ven. Tsung-Tueng explained that their project seeks to help patients return to their warm homes for spending their final stage of life. However, family members often do not know how to handle a patient as they approach death and this may increase the patient’s suffering. Spiritual care is time consuming and requires sufficient caregivers with professional and long term training. Enter the Clinical Buddhist Chaplain, who Ven. Tsung-Tueng envisions as actualizing Buddhist practice, participating in social welfare, promoting life education, and supporting healthy lifestyles. This is realized concretely through three basic activities: providing spiritual care to terminal patients in the community, making regular visits to family homes and community care centers, and offering support groups for both patients and families. In 2017, the group engaged in 209 visits to private homes, 112 visits to community care institutions, and a few assorted private and telephone consultations. Outside of the actual spiritual care provided by monastics—which may include specific Buddhist practices like chanting the Buddha’s name, calligraphy, and hand-painting meditation—one of the most important activities of the Great Compassion Institute is training community volunteers in spiritual care for the dying and their families. Since 2014, they have trained 55 such volunteers. Ven. Tsung-Tueng with her colleague Ven. Zhihui concluded by noting that religious organizations and monasteries that focus on issues such as end-of-life care and senior care can provide powerful assistance and support to grieving families and the well being of the community. Their work is an extremely important extension and development from the hospital based model developed by the CBC program.


A short but lively panel discussion followed these presentations, and one question addressed the innovative natural burial garden at Dharma Drum Mountain Temple that Ven. Huimin spoke about in his presentation. This idea came from Dharma Drum’s Founder, Master Sheng Yen (1930-2009), who wanted to promote joint funerals in the Buddhist spirit of simplicity and solemnity by avoiding the usual extravagance and loudness marked in traditional funerals. He felt a natural burial reflects caring for the environment and allows future generations to enjoy a wonderful, sustainable environment. His plan for a Memorial Garden on the mountainside at Dharma Drum symbolizes this care for the environment through a frugal and clean burial as well as life education in its fuller sense. 
There are no tomb plaques or name plaques. Ashes are separated into a number of containers and buried separately to break the conventional concept of occupying a single place for remembrance. The cremains are thus allowed to merge with the soil, representing the eternal circle of life and the unity of all beings. Master Sheng Yen felt this enables people to have an all-embracing mind, forsaking the fear for death. At first, this vision could not be realized due to legal restrictions and public reluctance to such an idea. However, after more than a dozen years of effort, the Memorial Garden was opened for use on November 24, 2007, and Master Sheng Yen himself was buried there after his passing in 2009.

Other central questions from the audience revolved around how the Clinicla Buddhist Chaplain training program could be participated in by Buddhists outside of Japan. As mentioned, there is now a basic collaboration with the Rinbutsuken Institute for Engaged Buddhism in Tokyo, which is in part facilitateted by Japanese being able to read and use Chinese characters. At this time, the program does not function in English, and it is difficult for foreigners to do on the job training in Taiwanese hospices and hospitals because of the language barrier. Rev. Jin, Director of the Rinbutsuken Institute, would like to create an international network of Buddhist chaplain training groups in the near future. With the support of Jonathan Watts, who works with Rev. Jin and also serves on the INEB Executive Committee, INEB might be able to play an important role on facilitating further linkages and cooperative work in this area, such as site visits to the variety of programs and activities, some of which are being highly developed among Buddhists in the United States, for mutual exposure and study. Hosting and facilitating short-term study and training courses are another activity INEB could support as it has numerous training centers throughout its network. As connections and interests develop in various countries on this issue, INEB can offer a non-affiliated umbrella for hosting short study and training programs with visiting experts in the field of Buddhist chaplaincy training. These are basic areas of engagement as the movement continues to develop internationally. In conclusion, INEB is extremely grateful to the generosity of its Taiwanese hosts for making this connection to a very important form of Buddhist social engagement that we hope will continually to develop widely throughout the Buddhist world.

For greater detail on the history and development of the CBC program in Taiwan and other such Buddhist initiatives around end-of-life care see Buddhist Care for the Dying and Bereaved, edited by Jonathan S. Watts & Yoshiharu Tomatsu (Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2012)

[1] The Lotus Blossom: The Clinical Buddhist Monastics Practicing in Hospital Sites, DVD (Taipei, Taiwan: Buddhist Lotus Hospice Care Foundation, August, 2009).

[2] Huimin, “The Cultivation of Buddhist Chaplains Concerning Hospice Care: A Case Study of Medical Centers in Taiwan,” trans. Jonathan Watts (lecture, Dharma Drum Buddhist College, Taiwan, September 29, 2009).

2018年1月26日 星期五

戍士行

謝雲飛教授:     戍士行
退休至今,忽忽二十年,其間嘗居西雅圖十年,以老年不慣寒冬冷冽,故凡歲暮則回台北,經年飛機來往,鄰人譏為“空中飛人”;後終因年老,無良好醫療照顧而回台北。
憶居西雅圖日,嘗與近鄰數人組“翠湖詩社”,吟唱用閒,自得其樂。時所作有“戍士行”一首,諸友以為堪可一讀,因再謄錄電郵,以請益指教云爾。

繼續閱讀請點選下面這個數字                                 [ 26.1.18  ]

2018年1月22日 星期一

2018年1月20日 星期六

20個長壽法


20個長壽法 


1.    唱歌;  2.  跑步;   3. 不要久坐;  4. 吃薑黃;  5. 少攝取卡路里;

6.  吃綠葉菜;  7. 擁抱;  8. 吃花椰菜;  9. 睡眠質量;  10. 開心;

11. 少吃糖; 12. 保持鎮靜;  13. 飲茶;  14. 吃蘋果;  15. 少看電視;

16. 跳舞;  17. 吃大蒜;  18. 吃堅果;  19. 護理牙齒;  20. 大笑。


行天宮五大志業體丁酉年歲末感恩關懷年會

2018年1月5日 星期五

老人的境界


健康E世界〔1071月號〕老人的境界/謝雲飛教授

謝雲飛教授

這裡所說的不是老人高超的人生境界,而是特別提出的、因老邁痛苦而不能擺脫的衰老退化、惹人譏刺、受人鄙棄的「可悲境界」。

這種趨於老境的可憐現象,很多很多的年輕人是無法明瞭的。

記得我年輕時,曾譏笑一些老人先輩,說他們愚蠢、嫌他們囉嗦、屎多尿頻、人前放屁、動作呆滯、大聲咳嗽、忘東丟西、窮緊張、易哭笑……

有一回,在香港機場看到一位返鄉探親的老兵,因一時着急而找不到護照,居然緊張得當眾大哭起來,當時我還年輕,總覺得:這人的一舉一動怎麼都那麼笨?現在,我才明白,不是他笨,而是我根本不明白老人的境界。

人是群居的動物,縱然偶有離群索居的怪異人物,但那究竟是少之又少,無需以常理況之的。因此,凡人必當與他人共處,緣父母、夫妻、子女、親戚、朋友、同學、同事的因由,就形成了各式各樣的人際關係。

在人與人相處的關係中,就會發生各種不同類型、不同情況的感情:父子情、夫妻情、親戚情、愛情、友情……,相互之間,有親密、誠摯、敷衍……等等各種不同的情境產生。這些情境,縱使偶有至死不渝的堅貞至情出現,但多數的現象總是因時、因地、因特殊情況而隨緣變遷的。

當相互的情感處在最好、最完美的情境之中時,總希望能永續長存,經久不變的,可惜人世間的一切卻永遠是無常多變、隨境更易、永不止息的。這種無常的現象,會產生感情上的變遷痛苦,佛家稱之為「無常苦」,人生在世,基本上是無法脫離這個「無常苦」的,因此,人人都只能逆來順受,無法閃避了。

人生既然是無常的,則少壯必將走向老邁:聰明變作糊塗,智慧成為愚蠢,多才轉為笨拙,幹練趨至無能,也就成為人生的必然現象了。這是人生的一大「痛」,是任誰也躲避不過的,有時候,它會把一位備受人們敬仰的人物,逼向威嚴喪失、自尊耗盡,而成為受人厭惡的自卑老朽。想想看:如果是一位曾經十分受人敬仰的人物,一旦降格為人所不齒、遭人唾棄的可厭境況,在那人本人來說,會是多麼感傷的事啊!

可是,這卻是多數人無法避免的境況,當你慢慢地走向「老境」時,遲鈍、健忘、聽不清、視不明、手腳不靈、全身痠痛、行動不便……等等就全來了,可是你還是得揹負著無限的痛苦挨下去,而這種境況在很多年輕人來說,他們是根本無法體會了解的。我年輕時,有一次在考試院閱卷,曾看到一位老先生打翻了一杯濃茶,把一疊考卷全泡濕了,周圍的許多人都在搖頭鄙視,竟無一人表示同情;我也曾在交通車上看到,經常有幾位老人在高談寒夜尿頻,兩腿無力,而煩惱痛苦;早年時,老立委吳延環曾在中央副刊方塊中答復一位讀者,老人一天大便兩次、三次、甚至四次都算是「正常」的;我的一位八十歲親戚曾告訴我七八天沒有大便,苦不堪言……。這一切年輕人諱不願談的生活隱私,到老人群中竟都晾開來,如談家常。這都是年輕人無法想象、無從體會的。

如今,我已進入九十高齡了,前面所提到的那些「老人境界」都慢慢地出現在我的日常生活當中,到如今,我才了解:當時年輕,無法了解老人的境況,而對老年人有諸多的誤解,以致形成了自己今日的愧悔,因而特別將所歷所感抒發成文,提醒年輕的後生朋友,千萬不要「錯怪」你身邊的無辜老人。

當醫師是病人時


1071月號〕當醫師是病人時/陳榮基


1071月號〕當醫師是病人時/陳榮基

唐代詩人韓愈(AD 768-824祭(姪子)十二郎文曰:「吾年未四十,而視茫茫,而髮蒼蒼,而齒牙動搖」,感謝先人代代的努力,人類平均壽命逐漸延長,我們今天年近八十,才剛剛有相同的感受。大明星珍芳達在79歲時告訴我們現代人平均比我們的祖父母輩多活34歲,她說這是生命的第三章。雖然身體逐漸衰老,但是心靈要繼續向上提升。
感謝我曾經服務了30多年的醫院,很貼心的提醒退休老教授們每年健檢。在數年前一次健檢時發現眼睛有問題,於是定期到眼科門診接受追蹤檢查,如果是半年一次預約的,大多可約到10號之內;但如果是突發狀況,提前約診,則往往電腦約到560號,甚至70號。我在上午十時許到診間前候診,才看完二十幾位病人,我就按部就班地等候。病人實在太多,醫院再提供更多的候診椅,還是不夠。偶爾就要站立等候,還好,雖然都是病人,但是因為「而髮蒼蒼」,常常會享受年輕朋友的讓位。雖然主治醫師是我的學生,但是我還是規規矩矩地等到過午才輪到看診,還真不忍心看到我的這位優秀學生的主治醫師後面還有二、三十位病人在等候!
追蹤了幾年後,終於右眼的白內障成熟",在去年初接受人工水晶體的手術,一個多小時就完成手術,在開刀房恢復室躺一陣子就回家了。感謝右眼又恢復了原先的功能。繼續追蹤了一年,左眼的水晶體也該退休了,更糟糕的是視網膜剝離的程度加劇,只好決定接受白內障與視網膜兩種手術,由兩位專家接力手術,先置換人工水晶體,接著修補破裂的網膜並注入氣體,以維持壓扁分裂的網膜。
雖然手術花不到兩小時,但是術後的保養",就有得受了",只好住院!為了利用氣體向上的浮力壓網膜,病人晚上要趴著睡覺",白天趴在"桌面上。醫院很貼心的在床面及桌面,各挖了個四方形的洞,讓病人趴在頭墊上鼻子還有呼吸的空間。這種趴趴族的日子,真的度日如年",真佩服年輕人還自願整天把頭趴在手機上過日子!雖然是趴在軟墊上,但還是會把兩眼眼皮壓的腫腫的!主治醫師看著腫脹的眼皮,就知道病人有乖乖地趴了!
住院8天,接受醫護同仁等親切細心的照顧,每天一早7點住院醫師及主治醫師都會在病房檢查室,細心檢查。當聽到醫師說狀況很好"時,是莫大的欣慰。每位住院醫師或護理同仁,每次在診治或服務病人時,都會先「請問貴姓大名及生年月日」。有些病人可能會覺得很煩!聽說有位老太太住院回家後,家人問她的感想,老人家說:「這家醫院的醫師護理師都很親切,把我照顧得很好;但是她們好像記性不太好,每天都要問我姓名生日!」當我自己身歷此境時,卻哭笑不得,因為這是我參加醫院評鑑團隊時,所共同訂立的SOP!為的就是保障病人安全,不會給錯藥,或開錯刀!尤其在開刀當天,要前往手術室時,護理同仁還要問,「是那一眼要開刀,那位醫師/開什麼刀?」而且在我的左眼上還貼一張膠紙上書左眼!感謝醫院所有工作同仁直接或間接地提供適當且親切的服務,努力照顧好每位病人。病人的安全與利益,是最重要的考量!醫療的效果,醫師的專業能力很重要,而病人能否遵守重要的醫囑,也是成功的要項。讓我們與醫師好好合作,創造健康的晚年。多用同理心關懷情,醫病和解,是大家的幸福。
聽說糖尿病與高度近視(五百度以上)是引起網膜剝離的重要原因,而從小長時間看書,看電腦,尤其是看手機,引起眼睛疲勞,則是導致近視的重要禍首。維護健康要從小做起。紫外線也是眼睛的重要殺手,白天出門帶防紫外線的墨鏡也很重要()

Battle of Bhima Koregaon symbolizes a war against caste oppression


Battle of Bhima Koregaon symbolizes a war against caste oppression

 published in  Asia Times


IndiaOpinion

Battle of Bhima Koregaon symbolizes a war against caste oppression

By Mangesh Dahiwale January 4, 2018 8:08 PM (UTC+8)



I have been visiting Bhima Koregaon regularly for the last 10 years on  January 1 to pay homage to my ancestors for their valor and bravery. The 200th anniversary of the Bhima Koregaon battle this year brought more than a million people, not only from Maharashtra, but also from other parts of India.

After 200 years, the monument at Bhima Koregaon has transformed into a symbol of social revolution throughout the country.

The daily

Report

Must-reads from across Asia - directly to your inbox



The Battle of Bhima Koregaon is a historic event in many ways. On January 1, 1818, a disciplined and organized army of 500 defeated the 28,000-strong army of the Peshwas/Brahmins. The 500 disciplined Mahars (now converted to Buddhism) and some other marginalized castes along with the British officer(s) defeated what can be considered the inhuman, draconian casteist rule of the Peshwas.



The Peshwa/Brahmins enacted the caste codes of the Manu Smriti (an ancient text that lays down codes for a version of Hinduism) and the Mahar-Nags were forced to wear earthen pots around their necks and a broom on their back, so that if they spat, they spat in the pot tied around their necks, and their footprints would be swept by the broom. Their touch was labeled as “polluting” by the Brahmins. Even their shadow was considered polluting.

In the history of the world, many battles and revolutions have been fought against slavery. The Haitian Revolution started in 1791 by African slaves resulted in the takeover of Haiti by 1804. African-Americans waged a similar battle for equality, and the rebellion of black slave Nat Turner is a landmark event.

The Bhima Koregaon battle is important because the worst kind of oppressors were defeated. The origin of the Mahars is discussed by Dr B R Ambedkar in a short paper on “Who Were the Mahars?” and historically Mahars were a martial race. They were the brave classes who fought with bravery to defeat the Brahmins. Not only the Mahars, but the major untouchable castes were all martial races.

That was the time when India was divided into small kingdoms ruled by different monarchs. Though there were many kingdoms, the Manu Smriti reduced erstwhile martial classes of untouchables (and former Buddhists) to the lowest rungs of society.

Ambedkar found the origin of the word Mahars and that it came into usage around 1700. Gustav Oppert, a remarkable German Indologist, in his book The Original Inhabitants of India reveals that untouchable castes throughout the country have a common social origin. If we trace their history, it goes back to the history of the conflict between Buddhism and Brahminism. Untouchability is the outcome of the Brahminical hatred toward the Buddhists, which continues even today.

The battle of Bhima Koregaon in 1818 was fought at a time when Dalits were treated as less than humans by the Brahminical Peshwas.  After the battle, the British became the masters of India. Even in the battles of Plassey and Buxor in Bengal, the untouchables of the regions fought side by side with the British East India Company’s army.

Though India was united politically under the British and the untouchables fought with the hope of their rights and their liberation, the British were ungrateful, and they recruited other castes into the military after they won India. They delisted the untouchables. They only started listing them when they realized that untouchables had risen politically through social mobilization. Babasaheb Ambedkar played a role in starting the Mahar regiment again in 1940s.

The present context: January 1, 2018

What was strange this time was the way everything was arranged by the Maharashtra state government run by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). If you were traveling to the memorial from Pune by the Ahmednagar Road, the vehicle was halted 5 kilometers before reaching it. This turned the visit into a laborious walk. Imagine so many mothers and sisters walking with their children for 10km. The mass of people at the Bhima Koregaon memorial probably numbered several hundred thousand.

The privileged “upper” caste Hindus, probably instigated by suspected RSS/BJP members, threw stones at the people coming from this approach. They set vehicles on fire in a bid to scare people away. The crowd remained undeterred and non-violent. Only after this violence was unleashed did the Dalits come out on the streets to protest and deny them their right to celebrate a historic victory.

The context: past and present

The violence perpetrated during the celebration of Bhima Koregaon by the Brahminical Hindutva forces must be placed in the context of the larger contemporary political scene in India. The battle of Bhima Koregaon was decisive for the future evolution of the Bahujan (Dalit) movement for social justice. Otherwise, oppressed Indians would have languished in perpetual social degradation.

When the Marathas (a dominant farming caste) were ruling significant parts of India after the social, political and cultural revolution of Shivaji Maharaj (King), society was not as divided on the basis of caste. The great king never discriminated on the basis of caste and religion. On the contrary, the arrogant Brahmins disrespected him, as is evident from  many historical sources where he is described as the Shudra (lower caste) King.

The term “Marathas,” then, was not the name of a caste, but a linguistic identity. Today, dominant farmers use it to assert their caste pride. The word “Maratha” emerged after the language (Marathi) that the majority of people in the kingdom of Shivaji spoke (present-day Maharashtra, whose name is derived from the Mahars). The Marathas included various castes. The history of the Marathas is connected with that of the Vakatak/Satvahans, who were Buddhist rulers

However, through their political machinations, Brahmins took over the Maratha kingdom and used Manu Smriti to justify their rule. The great Sambhaji, the son of Shivaji, was killed according to the dictates Manu Smriti as he dared to study Sanskrit. It dictates that the Shudras cannot read, write, or hear Sanskrit. When Sambhaji Maharaja was thus killed, it was a Mahar soldier Govind Gaikwad who collected Sambhaji’s mortal remains and gave them an honorable funeral, defying a Mughal diktat. That is the reason the Brahminical forces vandalized Gaikwad’s tomb on December 28 last year.

Had it not been for the victory in the battle of Bhima Koregaon, there would be no Mahatma Phule, the father of India’s social revolution. Famously, his father told Jotiba that had it not been for the victory of the British and the defeat of the Brahmin Peshwas in Pune, he would have been reduced to a plaything of the Brahmins. If Jotiba had not emerged, Bhimba (Dr Ambedkar) would not have emerged, and we Indians would be still ruled by the inhuman Brahminical Peshwas.

The Battle of Bhima Koregaon was a successful contest for the social and political emancipation of the Bahujans, including the Marathas and the other castes. Therefore, the architects of the Bhima Koregaon victory are the founders of the ongoing battle between the 85% Bahujans and 15% Brahmins and Banias. This is a historical trajectory that must be understood in this context.
以上是兩百年前印度種性壓迫的悲慘抗爭史。祈禱人類文明早日全面平等和平相處!

告別練習 歡迎參加


2018年1月2日 星期二

理想人生



繼續閱讀請點下面"這篇文章的連結"

2018年1月1日 星期一